UAV-CAS
UAV-CAS (UAV Collaborative Attack Scenarios) is a large-scale labeled flow dataset for intrusion detection in UAV swarm networks, generated by a Containernet digital twin that is systematically calibrated against measurements from the NSF AERPAW testbed.
π¦ Dataset β IEEE DataPort (doi:10.21227/zgrg-z865)
π» Simulator & calibration code β GitHub
π Paper β arXiv:2606.17845
Why it exists
IDS models trained on wired-network benchmarks such as CICIDS2017 and UNSW-NB15 degrade sharply in real UAV swarms, where mobility, fluctuating link quality, and decentralized routing reshape traffic distributions. Existing UAV-specific datasets do not systematically vary those conditions β which leaves no way to train or test a detector against the very shift that defeats it. They also do not cover collaborative attacks, where several adversaries coordinate different attack types whose combination is invisible to a single-flow detector.
Collecting this on physical hardware is not practical: it needs sustained flight hours, dedicated spectrum and airspace, and the ability to safely execute attacks that a physical testbed will not permit. UAV-CAS closes the gap in simulation and then argues the fidelity case with measurements rather than assertion.
Whatβs in it
| Β | Β |
|---|---|
| Flows | 99,492 |
| Configurations | 1,024 |
| Attack families | 5 β DoS, DDoS, blackhole, wormhole, replay |
| Collaborative compositions | 9 (synchronized and complementary pairings) |
| Full label taxonomy | 15 benign and attack classes |
| Generation | Containernet digital twin, AERPAW-calibrated |
| Released artifacts | dataset, simulator, calibration data |
The configuration grid varies four axes independently, so shift can be attributed rather than merely observed:
- swarm size β 5 vs. 20 drones (the dominant source of distributional diversity)
- transmit power β 10 vs. 30 dBm
- mission profile β spiral vs. random mobility
- path-loss model β log-distance vs. 3GPP
No single axis accounts for the datasetβs diversity, which rules out the datasetβs spread being an artifact of one over-weighted parameter.
Calibration β the fidelity argument
A four-layer pipeline validates the twin against AERPAW at increasing levels of abstraction: altitude-dependent path loss, mission-specific mobility, the link-level performance chain, and end-to-end trace fidelity.
Simulated-to-real RSS divergence measures 0.33 Hellinger. The reference point that makes that number interpretable is the 0.73 divergence between two independent real measurement campaigns β so the gap between the twin and the hardware is smaller than the gap between two hardware measurement runs.
Benchmark: what 10 baseline IDS reveal
Binary attack detection is a learnability floor, not the operational task. On binary benign-vs-DoS, nine of ten architectures exceed 0.99 weighted F1 and the lowest reaches 0.989 β which confirms the data is clean and learnable, and also explains why the field can look solved.
The difficulty is in the full multi-class taxonomy. Per-class F1 ranges from near zero to 0.82 and falls into the single digits for stealth attacks. Stealth-paired collaborative compositions β blackhole+wormhole, blackhole+replay β collapse to 0.51β0.86 AUROC.
The design intent is visible in the statistics: standard deviations on flow-level features are wider for stealth attacks (blackhole, wormhole) than for floods, because stealth attacks are built to mimic the natural variability of benign UAV traffic. High-rate DoS and DDoS flows form compact clusters in a t-SNE projection; stealth flows do not. When both components of a composition are individually near-benign, no single-flow feature suffices β detection has to reach for cross-flow or temporal-context signal.
Intended use
- training and evaluating IDS under controlled distribution shift, with shift attributable to a known configuration axis
- collaborative / multi-adversary detection, including set-recovery formulations where the label is the composition rather than a single class
- early-detection studies from short packet prefixes
- stress-testing detectors that report strong binary numbers on legacy benchmarks
- transfer and generalization studies between wired, IoT, and aerial network traffic
Citation
@article{mishra2026uavcas,
title = {UAV-CAS: A Calibrated Digital-Twin Dataset for Intrusion
Detection in UAV Swarm Networks},
author = {Mishra, Sripath and Bhargava, Bharat and Liu, Zizheng
and Islam, Shafkat},
journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.17845},
year = {2026}
}
Dataset DOI: 10.21227/zgrg-z865
